Re: [PATCH] Xft related configure option fixes.

[Moved from -patches because this is more of a design discussion] Thanks Stephen for the reply. It's nice to have a well defined spec for a change:-) Malcolm> 1) --with-complex not supplied: Malcolm> with_complex_foo="" Malcolm> with_complex_bar="" Malcolm> with_complex_baz="" Stephen> I want Stephen> with_complex_foo="yes" Stephen> with_complex_bar="no" Stephen> with_complex_baz="" It should be pointed out that this is slightly different behaviour from the normal argument case. In that case if --with-simple is not supplied then the shell variable with_simple is "". Any default values have to be supplied by the user in the ACTION-IF_FALSE part of the AC_WITH_ARG macro. My proposal was in line with the traditional behaviour but yours I think is better. Your desiderata does not address this case: Malcolm> 4) --with-complex=bar Malcolm> with_complex_foo=no Malcolm> with_complex_bar=yes Malcolm> with_complex_baz=no (ie, if you explicitly set one or more options, all other options are set to 'no'. You came up with this requirement with discussing --with-error-checking a few months ago. The post can be found at: http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-beta/200510/msg00481.html Is this case still a requirement? Malcolm -- Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org&gt;