On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
PATCH 21.5
Well, that was a bunch of nonsense. Ignore this patch. I was
thinking that wrap_foo worked differently than it does. It's
essentially just converting the pointer into an integer, so the two
wrap_fc_config() calls should produce the same value.
Still, it seems likely that garbage collection has something to do
with this, doesn't it? That's the only way I can see the fccfgPtr
field being set to NULL. Maybe we are missing a gcpro somewhere.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta