Re: xemacs-21.5.9 fails to build on Itanium system

mb> I fixed all the 64-bit bugs in XEmacs on DecOSF/Alpha, and mb> that platform worked fine at least until March 2001, when I mb> stopped regular testing. Yup. I believe I've seen a couple of success reports on that platform since Sept 2001 (when my DecOSF/Alpha box got reverted to a Solaris box), but it's definitely Martin's testing and the not so tender ministrations of the KKCC crowd that makes me think 21.4 might be a little cleaner. Mike, are your guys paying proper attention to 64-bit issues while you're doing surgery on the allocator? -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.