Re: PLEASE TEST XEmacs 21.4.9 "Informed Management" Release Candidate 1

nix> Hm. That's still not very clear, but I hope this rephrasing nix> makes it a bit clearer than it was. I tried to explain it in nix> the original patch postings, too: if you read all of these nix> together then some sense might emerge :) I plan to do so. nix> Thanks for considering this at this late stage. The other thing you might do is see if you can get the w3m people and Bill P to sign off on "yes, this really does make things better" with examples, or better yet, screen shots. Sounds tedious even to me, and it won't guarantee a decision either way. But the more evidence that there is visible (pun intended) benefit the easier it is to say yes. nix> Damn :( still, until you've seen an NFS server with an nix> effective file transmission rate of 10K/s you haven't seen nix> slow. Anything that reduces file access from a box like that nix> is good. :) Doesn't mean it won't go in. It is likely that I'll rewrite it as an option, and possibly default it to off. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py