Re: Bug in new vc
Markus.Grunwald(a)pruftechnik.com writes:
> Have you posted a Lisp backtrace for this?
Yes, I have. But no problem, I'll do as you showed me:
Ah, thanks.
At a guess, looking at these two lines
(goto-char (process-mark p)) (vc-exec-after (quote ...))
(#<process "cvs" pid 28616 state:exit> "exited
abnormally with code 1\n")
CVS is exiting unsuccessfully. This might not be an error, for
example grep with exits 0 (success) if it found something, 1 (error)
if it finds nothing but otherwise no problem, and 2 (error) if there
was a syntax error in the regexp. So maybe the process never gets any
output and there is no mark for that process buffer? Or maybe the
buffer gets killed.
However, I would assume that vc should know what to do if cvs diff
doesn't find any differences though, so anyway it's a bug.
What happens if you run cvs diff directly in that directory?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta