Some time ago, SL Baur wrote...
|+
|  Kirill M Katsnelson <kkm(a)kis.ru> writes:
|  
|  > A question. %f expands to filename, or nothing if a buffer is not
|  > associated with a file. I want to be able to display buffer name
|  > as a fallback if there's no file. What is better: introduce a
|  > new construct for this, say %F, or modify %f?
|  
|  Probably a new letter would be better.  Does FSFmacs work as you
|  describe?
|-
I do not have it installed, so do not know. Anyone?
Kirill