Re: enable-foo vs. with-foo is illogical
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
> There is absolutely no logic to whether an option is with-FOO or
> enable-FOO. This should be fixed.
The logic is supposed to be the following:
--with-foo:
Require (or disable with --require) the use of external software
Hi Hrvoje, I don't understand^^^^^^^^^
Shouldn't that be
`--without-FEATURE' or `--with-FEATURE=no'
Adrian
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrianï¼ xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/