Re: xemacs vs emacs
On Saturday, April 5, 2008 at 02:27:41, Stephen Turnbull wrote:
[...]
better editor == good for free software, but there are many cases of
conflict, and they are always resolved politically. The example of
DSOs has already been mentioned, while the recent decision to use
bzr for the future version control system of Emacs was made by a
person who is totally ignorant of distributed version control
(Stallman) and in the face of extremely serious performance
problems.)
So you say, they did no testing and just decided to use bzr,
too bad I like those threads where projects were discussing
and testing which DVS to use after cvs/svn.
Have performance issues with bzr been the reason why the
XEmacs developers have chosen hg? Didier said it was only
discussed on the internal mailing list.
Robert.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta