>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic
<hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
Hrvoje> XEmacs FAQ Maintainer <faq(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> +@email{sds@(a)usa.net, Sam Steingold} writes:
> +
> +@quotation
> +@lisp
> +; both XEmacs and Emacs
> +(define-key global-map [(control right)] 'forward-word)
> +@end lisp
> +or
> +@lisp
> +; Emacs only
Hrvoje> Could you please change `Emacs' to `FSF Emacs' or `GNU Emacs'?
XEmacs
Hrvoje> is just as much Emacs as is FSF Emacs.
Note that what Hrovje suggests will alienate RMS should he ever see it
(both alternatives). He told me he either wants people, when using
"GNU Emacs", to also call XEmacs "GNU XEmacs". Just calling them
"Emacs" and "XEmacs" is also fine with him, but not a cross between
the two. So currently there's no way to refer to both in one document
that will please both camps.
[ I personally think we should ignore RMS's sensitivity on the matter
and follow Hrvoje's suggestion. I was just wondering whether anyone
cares about not pissing off RMS. ]
--
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla