Hauke Fath writes:
But that's not what I said - although the way you snipped the
context makes
it look like that.
No, even with context your phrasing was ambiguous. I merely chose the
interpretation that is consonant with my understanding of the facts.
It is a usual problem, though, _when_ "BSD proponents" get
"quite
annoyed with incorporation of BSD code in a GPL project", as David
put it.
Not in my experience, although the experience is perhaps biased. It
was gained in fora where BSDers' sense of "freedom" collides with that
of FSFers, such as Russ Nelson's Free Software Business list.
It was *very* common in those fora for BSDers to talk about the
unfreedom of copyleft and the unfairness of the way GNU sucks in
permissively licensed software and returns nothing to the wider
community including non-GPL projects. Stallman's penchant for
demanding that "GNU" be prefixed to every use of the word "Linux" not
followed by "kernel", while failing to mention the contributions to
the GNU System by Larry Wall, Don Knuth, MIT/X Consortium, Aladdin
Enterprises, and of course the BSD developers was another big
irritant.
On the contrary, I have never heard a BSDer say "If you would just
tell your damn camp followers to preserve copyright notices when they
copy our stuff into GPL projects, there'd be no problem." Surely that
would be a lie! And worry about copyright notices certainly doesn't
account for the EAY copyleft clause in OpenSSL.
I'm sorry, but I really don't think the annoyance being discussed here
is imaginary, nor is it about stripped copyright notices. True,
*some*, perhaps the majority of BSDers only care about the notices.
But there is always that vocal minority.... And I have definitely
seen FSFers (who as far as I know never have stripped copyright
notices) under the kinds of attack that David describes and
(incorrectly) attributed to Julian.
Note: I have normally espoused the BSD position on freedom
(essentially, "you can't force people to be free, but you can give
them permission, the more permission, the better") in such
discussions. However, I don't think it's good for advocates of that
position to gloss over the fact that there's a real philosophical
difference that (at least some of us) really care about, as much as
the FSF camp does about their position. And that being human,
sometimes we trash-talk our opponents.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta