RE: GTK: In or out? I need more non-Linux build reports!!

Please, please send build reports to xemacs-buildreports(a)xemacs.org. See http://www.xemacs.org/Releases/Public-21.2/tester.html. Summary: use M-x build-report. If you don't get a working XEmacs, you should report the build anyway, by setting build-report's variables. The ones you need to set to use a different XEmacs to report the build are build-report-installation-file and build-report-make-output-files. I am sure the precise reports given below will help Bill to solve the problems. _I don't care about the showstoppers because those are Bill's job; he'll either fix them or the decision is obvious._ What I do care about is minor weirdnesses that _don't_ stop the build. Of course, I won't be able to catch them all. But if I see even one or two under --with-gtk=no I'll have to conclude that this feature is too dangerous for inclusion in the release tarballs. Also, it's not clear to me whether David's build is --with-gtk=no. This is easily parsed from the build-report. I've done the same under cygwin _with_ X libraries. Don't see the first error, but I do see the second, plus another cygwin problem as related in http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-beta/200102/msg00481.html --with-gtk=no seems to work fine though. - Phil Bush, David writes: -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."