Re: .emacs vs .xemacs vs .xemacs.el vs...?
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> Yes yes yes! Agreed 100%.
>
> -> .xemacs-packages/ for personal packages
Why not .xemacs/packages ?
Yes, `.xemacs/packages' is better.
> -> .xemacs/ (if exists) for init files, otherwise various
~/.foo
> files...
I still fail to see why all these various .foo files (or there .el
equivalents) cannot be placed in the standard loadpath,
For the same reason you can't place .cshrc somewhere in your standard
path.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Idle RAM is the Devil's playground.