Re: Is xemacs' etags.el really "better and faster"?
Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
are you sure this isn't a font-lock problem? i use 21.5 for
development and i
have error-checking turned on and no optimization -- and i still see <1 second
for find-tag. this is on a pentium III 700mhz.
fwiw, one *major* speed killer for me is uniquify. took me some time
to find out what makes loading files so slow.
--
The only complaint I have against WinDoze is that it doesn't
always fail at install time. -- Mike Andrews, in s.d.m