Re: Possible GPL violation in package distribution
On Mon, 05 Mar 2001 16:43:16 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
<turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> said:
The issue is not providing the user with a non-buggy byte-compiled
.elc. It is providing the user with a buggy byte-compiler for their
amusement and documentation. Maybe they _want_ the bug. I consider
Oh. *Now* I understand. I was trying to figure out under what circumstances
we were allowing a broken byte-compiler to escape. I hadn't considered the
issue of being *required* to keep supplying the old broken version.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 211 bytes)