Re: That "vision" thang...

Jerry> Out of those, we got J. Kean Johnston's approval, so #2 can be Jerry> struck. We decided that #9 and #14 are not a problem. I took Jerry> the recommended actions for #15 and #21. What else? Don't know how I could have forgotten or missed that but now that the info is found again I must say -- Great! A few questions pops up though: - There seems to be quite a few files with no clear license. What does that mean or imply for a move to GPLv3? Shall or must we keep them as is or can they be move to GPLv3? - And how about item #13 which are copyrighted by IBM. Even though they don't have a stated license that seems still to be a problem to me. Can they really be used with GPLv3? - Is the analysis detailed enough or do we need to go through each file and tag them as I proposed earlier? Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta