I've noticed one other minor annoyance. If I select "r", the list of
required packages is built without reqard to whether the packages are
up to date or not.
Darryl Okahata writes:
greg(a)alphatech.com wrote:
> >>>>> "Darryl" == Darryl Okahata <darrylo(a)sr.hp.com>
writes:
> Darryl>
> Darryl> I've been buried in work and haven't had the time to hack on
the
> Darryl> code, but is there some magical variable that quietly suppresses the
> PGP
> Darryl> checks if PGP, etc. doesn't exist?
>
> No, it will just ask you if you want to continue without verification.
OK, I'll whack together a patch for this.
> Darryl> This brings up another question: should package-get always check
> Darryl> for a locally-cached version and use that if it exists, instead of
> Darryl> always downloading a package? I'd like to see this, but I don't
know
> if
> Darryl> this would cause problems for others, and I'd prefer not having
> Darryl> yet-another-config variable if I can avoid it.
>
> You can customize package-get-base-filename to something local, then
> M-x package-get-update-base and type the path to
ftp.xemacs.org when
> you want that one. There's not a function to save the database,
> though it is on my relatively short list.
Whoa. The `package-get-base-filename' needs to be made into a
plain filename (no directory, unless it's a relative path), that's
located via the paths in `package-get-remote'. Right now, we've got
two places that contains ftp site information, and we should be using
only one (`package-get-remote'). Why make people change two variables
when one will suffice? (This does, however, raise the problem where the
`package-get-base-filename' file could be obtained from a different
location from the other packages.)
[ This is an hot issue for me, as I want to be able to stuff XEmacs plus
all packages onto a CDROM for my friends and co-workers, and I took
special pains to insure that changing a single variable
(`package-get-remote') was sufficient to allow installations from
CDROM (or other local disks). ]
I'll be hacking on XEmacs soon. Should I fix this, or would you
like to?
--
Darryl Okahata
darrylo(a)sr.hp.com
DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.