Re: sync auctex 11.84: good news.
Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> My opinion (as a single reviewer, I haven't consulted with anybody) is
> that you should just go and ask Norbert when it would be convenient
> for him for you to commit what you've got (he'll probably say
"now"
> :-), and we can go from there.
>> Maybe the documentation should be "Used for special auto-autoloads
>> generation by auctex"?
> It would be better to be more specific. If you can't easily describe
> it in words, something like "See AUCTeX's XEmacs Makefile ca. line
> XXX" is sufficient.
What exactly is the state of art. Can Mats submit that Xemacs.rules
patch?
I cannot submit the auctex patch before that is settled down. From the
discussion I got the feeling that patch will be applied soon, however
I need that somebody will confirm it.
If there is a problem with stuff being appended to an autoloads file
manually, it is conceivable that the AUCTeX build procedure might be
changed to process the respective stuff into autoload cookies in some
temporary file from which the normal autoload generation could pick them
up.
But you'll need to describe the exact problem and the approach you'd
like to be taken to the AUCTeX developer list.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta