>>>> "ms" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
ms> would be much more natural, IMHO, to have a mule-lisp/
ms> directory alongside lisp/.
Agreed, in principle. What's keeping me thinking is trying to figure
out the impacts on other parts of XEmacs.
Note how your paths-load-paths-depth -> paths-core-load-paths-depth
change hosed the package build. Mule is much more pervasive.
I realize this is a different kind of change, but this is the first
time I've thought about it. I like the analogy to xemacs-packages vs
mule-packages vs site-packages; risk should be low. But with 6 weeks
to release, I'm nervous, OK? It's a big change, and you don't usually
do Mule, right?
Convince me.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."