Re: [Doc-bug] zap-to-char - including or up-to?
SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> David C Worenklein <dcw(a)gcm.com> writes:
>> zap-to-char was up-to-but-not-including in Emacs 18. It was fun
>> watching all my macros and functions break when RMS changed the
>> behavior.
> Ha ha ha! Cool. What a moronic change.
> (yes, zap-up-to-char is much more useful than zap-to-char.)
Do you want to put it back on `M-z'? Now is definitely the time ...
Not without a user poll.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Memory is like an orgasm. It's a lot better if you don't have to
fake it." -- Seymour Cray, on virtual memory