Jan Vroonhof wrote:
> I suggested the following patch:
Did you post it to xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org to get it into the formal
review process?
Er, no. What I said originally was:
I'm posting this here because it probably warrants more
discussion
than it's going to get if I post it to xemacs-patches.
I'll post it to xemacs-patches, which is probably what I should have
done in the first place.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>