|--==> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>>"Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
Stephen> With a little care, it could
be a generic solution: the
Stephen> package would be "lisp-updates" or some such. Each
Stephen> separate fix would have its own feature. I suppose we'd
Stephen> need to make the feature "list" into a hash-table because
Stephen> these would probably accumulate pretty quickly.
Stephen> Alternatively, we could obsolete the symbols with every
Stephen> major release (so there would be "lisp-updates-21.1" and
Stephen> so on).
APA> I'm not sure I like this.
APA> This would add yet another complication to debugging people's setups
APA> who turn to comp.emacs.xemacs, stating: "My XEmacs does not work."
APA> In addition to the usual stuff we would have to find whether they run
APA> with any or some "lisp-updates".
'M-x report-emacs-bug' should probably include the value of
'packages-package-list' so we can easily tell which packages (and
versions) they have installed.
Tis on my todo list.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|