>>>> "Darryl" == Darryl Okahata
<darrylo(a)soco.agilent.com> writes:
Darryl> It's not a FreeBSD bug.
Darryl> If you grab the OpenMotif sources (R2.1.30), you'll see lots of
Darryl> references to Xprint routines. In particular, see the source file:
Darryl> motif/lib/Xm/PrintS.c
Darryl> As far as I can tell, the OpenMotif print code is not conditionalized;
Darryl> it's always compiled. I don't see how you can use OpenMotif without
-lXp.
There is no libXp in my OpenMotif 2.1.30 installed on Linux.
Functions from PrintS.c end up in libXm.so, like they're probably supposed to.
If motif/lib/Xm/PrintS.c was supposed to contribute to libXp.so, why
isn't it in motif/lib/Xp/PrintS.c ?
(martin@lasker) /usr/local/dt/lib $ ldd libXm.so
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x401b5000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x401ff000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40208000)
libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x4021e000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40225000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40232000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x402d7000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
(martin@lasker) /usr/local/dt/lib $ nm libXm.so | g XmPrintSetup
00144f34 T XmPrintSetup