*Stephen:
René Kyllingstad writes:
> * Stephen:
> > The only solution acceptable to David is for us to distribute the
> > pseudo-package produced by the AUCTeX team verbatim. I see no
> > point in that;
> Convenience for the users? It would be there for the sumos, and
> available in the package manager without any special configuration.
> Pretty please?
And if I commit something to core that breaks it, what do you suggest?
Send bug reports to AUCTeX.
I'm arguing for a pragmatic solution, with the assumption that:
- core developer effort in XEmacs is currently almost 0.
- AUCTeX development is proceeding happily with a very strong commitment
to delivering a painless package for end-users, even providing a CVS
Emacs with it integrated as a one-click solution and an XEmacs package.
XEmacs Beta users would have to keep an older version of XEmacs around for
(La)TeX editing until the bug has been fixed.
-- René
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta