Re: Getting tired of "[Failure] The Package Smoketest"
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Michael Sperber writes:
> > Isn't that a bad thing? If it isn't, why does this defwhatever need
> > to be autoloaded at all?
>
> So that references to the variable don't fail, I assume.
C'mon, Mike, you're being evasive and lazy. If you make me do the
work that you're too lazy to do, don't expect me to be sympathetic.
Sympathy from you? You must be kidding :-)
I'm sorry, I misunderstood your question: I thought you were asking
about why the translation from `defcustom' to `defvar' is made.
Until the next week, I'm really strapped for time: Could you make the
change and remove the autoload cookie, and create an .upstream file?
Otherwise, it will just have to wait until then.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta