>>>> "CW" == Christoph Wedler
<Christoph.Wedler(a)sap.com> writes:
CW> auto-detect (if the info files are correct) and auto-detect
CW> when saving the buffer means XEmacs' way which is the Unix
CW> file ending.
Well, that should be fixed.
CW> Thus, I fail to see where "toggling" from nil to crlf is bad.
Of course, because you don't live where I do: on Unix. Now I have to
toggle again. That doesn't suck quite as much as the 6 step procedure
you mentioned, but it's not good.
CW> [Making buffer dirty on coding system change] is in the
CW> Windows branch as Andy has said? Not XEmacs-21.4.5...
Yes, and no. It will be in the next prerelease and in 21.4.6.
CW> Talking of patches, xemacs-patches is again broken. I got no
CW> robot reply for a couple of patches
No, you don't get a reply. If that was done before, it got broken
when Jason move the MLs from Tux to SourceForge. Sigh. I'd really
rather be working on releases than on mailbots.
CW> * "Toggling" Unix -> Dos -> Mac -> ... doesn't seem to
be
CW> what people really need.
More Windows-centric thinking. Yes, [X]Emacs is very Unix-centric,
and that bias should be reduced. But how about the Mac people?
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences
http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Don't ask how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.