Re: XEmacs Packages have been released (2003-11-13)

Jens> [snip] Jens> I think it is great that you now list the upstream version. Jens> Perhaps "No-Upstream-Ver" is a little verbose too though. Hi Norbert, Jens, I think No-Upstream-Ver is just plain ugly. It's a huge word, yet it's still is truncated at the end. It fails at both goals: being descriptive or being terse. The lisp way, of cource, would be upstream version: nil but that might seem user-unfriendly to some :-) I like "none" or a small set of words if we need to distinguish between none, unknown, unavailable, useless and what have you. Jens> How about writing instead "no upstream version" in this Jens> case or "n/a" (not available) or "none" say? I think that Jens> would make the list easier to read. :) Jens> Thanks, Jens -- Adrian Aichner mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org http://www.xemacs.org/