Re: Loading even small files reqs. clicking in/out multi. times
>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper <andyp(a)bea.com>
writes:
Andy> At 01:19 PM 6/21/2002 -0700, David M. Karr wrote:
> >>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper
<andy(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>
Andy> So out of curiosity are you running any sub-processes in XEmacs
> (e.g. a
Andy> shell) when you see the problem, if so can you try without?
>
> Ok, it just started happening again, so I looked at my process list, which
> this
> is an excerpt of:
>
> ------------------------
> Proc Status Buffer Tty Command
> ---- ------ ------ --- -------
> WWW<72> open *W3GRAPH*<73> (none) network
> stream connection 80(a)cfadvisor.webcoretech.com
> [41 similar items elided]
> WWW<30> open *W3GRAPH*<31> (none) network
> stream connection 80(a)cfadvisor.webcoretech.com
> ------------------------
> I then went to my "*scratch*" buffer and executed '(kill-buffer "
> *W3GRAPH*<73>")' 43 times, using each buffer name associated with each
"WWW"
Andy> Hmmn, so as a further matter of interest you weren't near the magic
number 64
Andy> for number of sub-processes?
Well, I'm not certain. If the output of "list-processes" really shows all
of
your sub-processes, then I was probably still under 64. I probably had 52-53
processes. However, I'm a little uncertain exactly what entries in that list
signify. I had thought that if I execute '(kill-process
"WWW<72>")' it would
directly kill that process. However, this gives me an error indicating "no
such process" (I don't remember the exact error message). So, either the
"Proc" column doesn't represent a process name you can send to
"kill-process",
or many of those entries don't represent real processes.
--
===================================================================
David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
dmkarr(a)earthlink.net