Andreas Röhler writes:
It looks clever and it is to the extent, you still know
what's happening. But why all this bugs over the years
then?
It's a doubly recursive acronym: BUGS Unify GNU Systems.
= = = =
More seriously, Emacs is buggy because it's a large collection of
hacks, and it is deliberately set up to make quick hacks work pretty
well rather than help you create robust applications. XEmacs shares
those problems to a great extent, but has a somewhat larger component
of "design before building" philosophy.
> > However, that value might be overridden by
> > `lisp-mode-variables' which uses a hard-coded value.
>
> You should look into using a specifier for this variable.
[snip]
> The main problem with this scheme is that there is no `mode'
locale,
> but it wouldn't be hard to add it, I think.
I just did this by the way. I haven't tried to build it yet, time to
go to bed, but I should be able to report on it tomorrow.
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta