Re: Why I attempted to port dired/VC from emacs

Rodney> I've been using vc with SVN daily for 3 weeks now and I Rodney> haven't had a bug pop-up. There are some annoying features Rodney> that have been discussed, but nothing's perfect. OOPS! I have a follow up on this. Good to hear that it works OK for you. There are some more problems though: - If dired-find-subdir is t then it seems like that in dired-find-buffer-nocreate the check whether the buffer has the right mode, dired or vc-dired-mode, isn't performed so that dired or vc-directory wins in creating the buffer. Both commands are then visiting the same buffer. With dired-find-subdir equal to nil makes dired and vc-directory use different buffers which is better. - When you do a vc-directory to a directory that you already are visiting in vc-dired-mode it seems like dired-sort-other is called and it just assumes it should relist the folder. The GNU Emacs versions seems to be smarter about whether a relist or not is necessary. If this is the right thing to fix or if the listing should be done again and omitting the non changed files should be applied again is another story. I'll see whether I can come up with a patch but if someone would like to help out with a fix for the above please do. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta