Re: Followup: Re: Releasing the Emacs guided tour into the public domain; also, video
On 4/14/07, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
I think it's preferable for Phil to maintain a canonical version
under
"all of the above"...
I agree. At least until I figure out whether (and how) GNU Emacs would
ship a wiki-modified version, I'd be willing to maintain an
ok-for-GNU-Emacs version.
On 4/13/07, Jason Spiro <jasonspiro4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Will the FSF need copyright assignment for small edits? For large
edits? How about the licensing issue: will the modified material be
only GFDL as opposed to tri-licensed?
Presumably if we had a dedicated wiki for this, we could require that
contributions be tri-licensed (just as Wikipedia requires that
contributions be GFDL'd). But the FSF would still want copyright
assignments in either case if it were going to ship a wiki version, so
I think using Wikimedia is just fine now.
--Phil
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta