>>>> "mt" == Marcus Thiessel
<marcus(a)xemacs.org> writes:
mt> Martin Buchholz writes:
> I think you'll find if you do
>
> cd src; rm temacs xemacs; make
>
> you'll get a runnable xemacs.
mt> Right, that works. I thought somebody changed the build process to go
mt> beyond this point and something else was failing. But it's old story
mt> ...
Like many souls before me, I implemented a half-way solution that made
things more convenient for me, that day. I'm still thinking about how
to do it right.
> Then we would never have a `temacs'.
mt> Is that what we are looking for indeed!? If there is no temacs (at
mt> least I like to force it) debugging the dump on new architectures
mt> would be more difficult.
Well, --pdump=no would stay.
And it is the portable dumper, right? No need to port to new architectures...
Martin