Re: Xft
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) writes:
> How stupid of me! Sorry for the noise!
Now that we've got you feeling guilty, maybe we can ask you where you
looked for it so we can put a cross-ref there?
I did some random google searches, which didn't yield too much. I
confess I didn't try very hard.
Seriously, the Xft documentation was pretty poor last I worked on it.
Maybe someobody's cleaned up since I did but I don't recall seeing any
patches. Any suggestions for documentation would be appreciated (not
limited to Xft!) since people are asking for a public release. Better
doc of new features is an absolute must.
I think Xft is the first new feature I've wanted to try in a long time.
I will try to play around with it to see what I can get and report
back here. What I have now looks pretty good, but the font it selected
isn't very good for me because it doesn't seem to be fixed width. And
the huge stream of messages about fonts isn't very good either. That
should probably go away for the release, but ok, I guess, for betas.
On the other hand, with my new LCD display at work, xemacs without xft
looks pretty good anyway, even with my default ugly courier font. :-)
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta