RE: [EXPERIMENTAL PATCH] Make NT heap death more informative.

Sorry - I haven't had any response from anyone with a system that breaks. My own informal tests, passing bad parameters to the GetModuleHandle() function, indicate that it will fail rather than crashing when passed addresses that aren't module base addresses, so the patch *should* be safe (it will just say "<unknown>" if the allocation blocking the heap is not an executable image). *I* think it's probably safe enough to go in, but after breaking selections for everyone on X (and actually on Windows as well - only less so), I'm a little wary of my gaining a reputation for submitting patches that break things ;-) Kind regards, Alastair. ____________________________________________________________ Alastair Houghton ajhoughton(a)lineone.net