Re: site-lisp overwritten by installed XEmacs Packages on Debian
|--==> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
APA> Steve, Debian does not use .../xemacs-packages.
APA> They use plain .../packages.
No offense to the Debian people, but IMO, they shouldn't.
APA> What's our standard on ~/.xemacs vs. ~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages
APA> etc.?
My understanding was that for packages they can go in
~/.xemacs/(mule|site|xemacs)-packages/ [1]
APA> Do we need to rely on on separation of mule-packages and
APA> xemacs-packages?
I believe so, yes. But as soon as the '--with-mule' configure option
disappears because XEmacs is Mule-enabled like it or not, we can get
rid of the Mule/non-Mule separation.
Footnotes:
[1] Don't quote me on the ~/.xemacs/site-packages/, I'm not 110%
certain on that one.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|