Re: sync auctex 11.84: good news.
Mats Lidell writes:
Hi Uwe, You wrote:
Uwe> What exactly is the state of art. Can Mats submit that
Uwe> Xemacs.rules patch?
I think I need to produce a patch with better documentation for it to
be accepted. Maybe also look at it again to see whether it can be done
in a better way.
I think the best thing at this point is to just get the whole thing
into CVS where people and the Package Build Smoketest can easily look
at it. As long as you CVS tag the current state, it's trivial to
recover by reverting the changes.
Norbert, what do you think? Do you plan to release a SUMO soon, or
anything else that would be held up by a broken AUCTeX? Mats's
XEmacs.Rules patch is small and easy to revert, and I can't help
document it until I see how it's used.
We could also put both on a CVS branch. I don't want to mess with a
megapatch in this case because it involves lots of removed, moved, and
added files. diff(1) and patch(1) don't deal with them any better
than CVS does, and we *have* to fix CVS anyway....
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta