Re: Future of XEmacs
>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Please don't misunderstand. The "must work in stable"
rule is not
intended to keep us from making progress. It's intended to prevent
regressions where a package that used to work in the stable XEmacs
breaks even though the user is using the same XEmacs they did
before.
I have a bad feeling that the very same problems you describe for the
future of ELPA and even worse is what we will get into here.
Then again. I will try to assist Michael with org-mode and we'll see
what that exercise will tell us about this kind of problem.
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta