Re: Release plans [was: Building packages with 21.5b29?]

Rodney Sparapani writes: Well, there is `xemacs-betaname' but I really don't see that being useful. Specifically, these things are not going to suddenly switch back to the old way when the beta gets promoted to stable. What you want is a version check, such as `(emacs-version>= 21 5)'. Note that, assuming I understand what you mean by the "package/lisp vs lisp/package problem", neither test is going to help with that because you have no place to put that test that will affect XEmacs's behavior in this respect. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta