>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> Jeff Miller <jmiller(a)smart.net> writes:
> os-utils & edit-utils are still listed as single packages.
They
> should be regular.
sb> No, it shouldn't. A "regular" package means no single lisp file can
sb> be removed safely. A "single-file" packages means each lisp file is
sb> independent and any one (or more) of them may be removed at will.
sb> That is not and will not be the case with os-utils and edit-utils.
> What happened to overlay? I've been playing with
flyspell-mode which
> requires it.
sb> It's in fsf-compat.
ah, I see.... I got bit in the ass twice by the same problem....
fsf-compat has the same, "distinction", as os-utils &
edit-utils.
jeff