Re: Unified file-name syntax?
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
David Kastrup writes:
> It is a different question, however, whether it makes sense at all for
> some project to go to all this hassle when XEmacs is likely going to
> move to GPLv3 eventually, anyway.
This will happen soon, I think.
The two things that need to be done are (1) to make sure that the
code
covered is all under the "GPLv2 or later" language, and (2) to confer
with the SXEmacs guys since they share our package distribution. (1)
has been done already, I think, by Mats Lidell, but needs to be
verified, and (2) won't take long.
Less time than you think... :-)
,----[ *xetla-changelog* ]
| 2007-11-27 02:03:29 GMT Steve Youngs <steve(a)sxemacs.org> patch-37
|
| Summary:
| Update the last of the GPL licence headers to GPLv3
| Revision:
| sxemacs--main--22.1.8--patch-37
`----
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - For lovers of fine things! |
| See <http://store.sxemacs.org/> for other fine things! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 316 bytes)