Re: compiling option for nomule
Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
It seems to me that there are three different ways of compiling
xemacs with respect to mule
- with-mule, compiles mule import in.
- with-mule=no no mule support in
- no option.
Those should really be only two, because no option is equivalent to
"with-mule=no". (Unless the default has changed to "yes", which I
doubt.)
In the last case when the compiled xemacs is started one sees the
words Raw in the left lower corner, while ISO8 in the mule case and
nothing in the -with-mule=no case.
It sounds like in one case you get the "file coding" feature, whereas
in the other case you don't. I'm not sure why that would be the case.