Re: Release plans [was: Building packages with 21.5b29?]
On 02/24/11 11:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
Sure. I was just wondering if you might have some foo-xemacs
package
installed that caused weird side effects. I've had several bug
reports against the Fedora XEmacs that turned out to be caused by
badly written add-on packages.
So ... I'm not sure what to check next. Could this be caused by the
presence/absence of some optional part of the X stack?
An optional part that is not
available on RHEL, Solaris and SUSE;
the platforms where 411 has been replicated? Yes, I guess it's
possible:o)
--
Rodney Sparapani Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research
Sr. Biostatistician http://www.mcw.edu/pcor
4 wheels good, 2 wheels better! Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW)
WWLD?: What Would Lombardi Do? Milwaukee, WI, USA
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta