RE: qxe generation problem

Benson Margulies writes: Recent GCC has been really picky about that stuff, but it issues warnings rather than errors. I think it's probably a Microsoft bug that it's an error rather than a warning, but even demoted to warning it's a pain in the neck, since for most purposes in XEmacs treating chars as ordered is a bug in itself. If the standards people really want to save the programmer from herself, IMHO compilers should divide chars not into "signed" and "unsigned", but into "ordered" and "unordered", and error on order comparisons of unordered chars. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta