Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net> writes:
It makes even more sense not to differentiate between identical
characters at all ...
No argument here.
Stephen-F˘s Latin Unity package assigns the Latin 9 characters as
the-B
corresponding keysyms-F˘ mappings, if no mapping exists when it˘s-B
loaded. To avoid this, and to have your Latin 2 characters inserted
by default, start XEmacs with the hr_US layout already loaded, and
the X11 platform code will look at the keysym on the keyboard, note
that it-F˘s in the Latin 2 range, and assign it the Latin 2 character.-B
I'm not sure what you mean. For one, I'm not even using latin unity,
so it can't be held responsible for this problem. Then, I don't think
starting XEmacs with hr_US already loaded helps any; XEmacs is capable
of locating "new" keysyms, looking up their character values, and
binding them to self-insert-command.
Also, why do you think the keysym will prove to be "in the Latin 2
range"? What if the keysym turns out to be in the Latin 9 range? š
and ž *are* also present in Latin 9.