Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] writes:
 >>>>> "dv" == Didier Verna
<verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
 
 dv> Andy Piper <andy(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
 
 >> These are not useless. It means you can just change the header instead of
 >> all of your source code if your definition of how to access bar changes.
 
 dv>         Yes, but I'd prefer being able to debug XEmacs, even if it costs me a
 dv> one-or-two-shot sed call on all sources to change "->foo" to
"->bar" once in a
 dv> year (century ?).
 
 Well, the solution to that is to move more code into the substrate,
 rather than switching the implementation language to one of the three
 most fucked-up languages alive. 
What are the other two candidates?
Mike