SL Baur <steve(a)vmailer.xemacs.org> writes:
Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes:
> And according to the FSF interpretation[1] of the Qt and GPL licenses,
> distributing a linked binary would thus violate the GPL.
Why isn't this an issue with a Motif-linked XEmacs? Because Motif can
usually be considered a system library?
This is a good point! My linux had no Motif 'til a bought one for about
$100. And so I think this is commercial also.
Motif allows dynamic as well es static linking for distribution (I bought a
developers license), Qt allows the same, Xforms (another good example) also,
only GPL collides with it... but nobody cares.
So we have only one choice: drop Motif (just joking ;-)
Regards,
Oliver.