Re: package-get-base props
Pete Ware <ware(a)cis.ohio-state.edu> writes:
But that's an RPM problem, isn't it? When you convert to RPM
format
you'll want to condense all the requires/provides into the actual
package names. Heck, you might even want to make them dependent on
the specific package version.
Correct. This is my plan. I'm just asking some stupid questions to get some
information.
Still missing (the provides requires stuff seems solved):
the dump flag of each package. Must a dump == t package be dumped with xemacs?
Why is vm one of these packages? In the rpm version I must put vm into the
main rpm (always) cause it needs to be dumped.
Or is there already a method for keeping temacs to redump if a package
requires it? If yes, I can put this redump easily into the post step of the
rpm. If this is not supported, I either must build different main packages
containing all combinations of dump packages (stupid), or will have to put all
dump packages into the main RPM (is ok, cause only a few packages require a
dump).
Who is the main-maintainer ;-) of the package stuff. I just want to bombard
him with some questions ;-)
Regards,
Oliver.