Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
It's me FKtPp ;) writes:
> A branch of test shows that GNU's overlays- function can accept any
> integer as BIG or END parameter -_-
[[ *sigh* I really detest that style of programming. No wonder the
overlays emulation is deprecated. ]]
> attachment is a changed overlay.el that with above 3 #'functions emulate
> the GNU's behavior.
Please submit it to XEmacs Patches as a patch against the Mercurial
repository. It will get faster review that way, at least from me.
You may also wish to put a copy on the tracker (this kind of thing
will eventually be done automatically but that is not implemented
yet).
I've created one with my two mail pasted in.
I can tell you already that (1) the docstrings *need* to be amended
to
describe the DWIM behavior, and (2) I'm almost certainly going to ask
that the normalization of arguments (null BUFFER -> current buffer,
truncating bounds and reordering them) be refactored as a defsubst.
Thanks!
What about this attached patch?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta