Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
 It's me FKtPp ;) writes:
  > A branch of test shows that GNU's overlays- function can accept any
  > integer as BIG or END parameter -_-
 [[ *sigh* I really detest that style of programming.  No wonder the
 overlays emulation is deprecated. ]]
  > attachment is a changed overlay.el that with above 3 #'functions emulate
  > the GNU's behavior.
 Please submit it to XEmacs Patches as a patch against the Mercurial
 repository.  It will get faster review that way, at least from me.
 You may also wish to put a copy on the tracker (this kind of thing
 will eventually be done automatically but that is not implemented
 yet).
    
I've created one with my two mail pasted in.
 I can tell you already that (1) the docstrings *need* to be amended
to
 describe the DWIM behavior, and (2) I'm almost certainly going to ask
 that the normalization of arguments (null BUFFER -> current buffer,
 truncating bounds and reordering them) be refactored as a defsubst.
 Thanks!
    
What about this attached patch?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta