Re: Qt Xemacs ??
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Colascione
<qtmstr(a)optonline.net> writes:
Dan> Like hell it would --- if the user isn't redistributing the
Dan> compiled binary, he needn't agree to the GPL, and therefore
Dan> is not bound by its terms --- and thus, linking on the user's
Dan> own computer to anything, even, say, XForms, would be
Dan> fine. At least as I see it.
As rms sees it too. He means with redistribution. He would be "shocked,
SHOCKED" at your misinterpretation of his words. ;-) We are discussing
what the XEmacs Project can and cannot do here, and obviously that
involves redistribution.
Would adding something like --with-qt that checks for Unix/X11 by default
and spits out a gigantic warning about breaking the GPL, and add another
one like --with-personal-qt that ignores it?
-bp
--
Ceterum censeo vi esse delendam