Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org> writes:
|--==> "SJ" == Simon Josefsson <jas(a)extundo.com>
writes:
SJ> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>This code cannot be distributed with XEmacs AFAICT. It certainly
>>cannot be mixed with XEmacs code.
SJ> I won't insist on adding it. If
xemacs.org doesn't want to distribute
SJ> non-GPL elisp code I think a "non-free" XEmacs package repository
SJ> could be useful, similar to non-free Debian packages.
I can't see how we could in any way support such a repository.
Wouldn't using one of these "non-free" packages violate XEmacs' GPL?
Isn't it the same thing as non-free Debian packages?
I'm thinking of XEmacs packages as something standalone from XEmacs.
I can't see how it would violate the GPL to separately distribute a
package with another license?
The best would be if it was possible to get in touch with the authors
and change the license, but I have failed.