|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes:
VS> On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 02:06, Steve Youngs wrote:
VS> I think this could be automated pretty easily too.
>
>You can come up with a way to do this. :-)
VS> Well, actually I misspelled "semi-automated" :)
VS> As I'm not familiar with the current process of how new package releases
VS> are done, I'll assume that you manually update Makefile (VERSION) and do
VS> a "make bindist".
More or less, yes.
VS> There could be a M-x foo-bar-update-package-version somewhere which
VS> would prompt for a package name, then the new version (defaulting to
VS> VERSION + 0.01). It would update Makefile (VERSION) and do a
VS> add-change-log-entry with a proper message. Useful?
Hmm. Shouldn't be too hard to hack something together. I'll look
into it.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|